Spatial versus object visualizers: a new characterization of visual cognitive style.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The visual system processes object properties (such as shape and color) and spatial properties (such as location and spatial relations) in distinct systems, and neuropsychological evidence reveals that mental imagery respects this distinction. The findings reported in this article demonstrate that verbalizers typically perform at an intermediate level on imagery tasks, whereas visualizers can be divided into two groups. Specifically, scores on spatial and object imagery tasks, along with a visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style questionnaire, identified a group of visualizers who scored poorly on spatial imagery tasks but excelled on object imagery tasks. In contrast, a second group of visualizers scored high on spatial imagery tasks but poorly on object imagery tasks. The results also indicate that object visualizers encode and process images holistically, as a single perceptual unit, whereas spatial visualizers generate and process images analytically, part by part. In addition, we found that scientists and engineers excel in spatial imagery and prefer spatial strategies, whereas visual artists excel in object imagery and prefer object-based strategies.
منابع مشابه
More Evidence for Three Types of Cognitive Style: Validating the Object‐Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire Using Eye Tracking when Learning with Texts and Pictures
There is some indication that people differ regarding their visual and verbal cognitive style. The Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire (OSIVQ) assumes a three-dimensional cognitive style model, which distinguishes between object imagery, spatial imagery and verbal dimensions. Using eye tracking as a means to observe actual gaze behaviours when learning with text-picture combinations...
متن کاملRevising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers
Sixty participants were administered spatial ability tests, a verbal ability test, and a visualizer–verbalizer cognitive style questionnaire. Although verbalizers tended to be a homogeneousgroupwithan intermediate levelof spatial ability, therewere2groupsof visualizers, 1 with high spatial ability (the spatial type) and another with low spatial ability (the iconic type).Tocompare theuseofmental...
متن کاملSpatial and Object Visualization Cognitive Styles: Validation Studies in 3800 Individuals
The well-established dissociation between the ventral object and dorsal spatial processing streams within the visual system suggests a contrast between object and spatial visual cognitive styles. We assessed the validity of this distinction using a self-report questionnaire in a sample of 3839 online participants, and laboratory cognitive tests in a subsample of 196. We found that (1) object an...
متن کاملObject-processing neural e⁄ciency di¡erentiates object from spatial visualizers
The visual system processes object properties and spatial properties in distinct subsystems, and we hypothesized that this distinction might extend to individual di¡erences in visual processing. We conducted a functional MRI study investigating the neural underpinnings of individual di¡erences in object versus spatial visual processing. Nine participants of high object-processing ability (‘obje...
متن کاملTesting the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style?
College students (Experiment 1) and non-college adults (Experiment 2) studied a computer-based 31-frame lesson on electronics that offered help-screens containing text (text group) or illustrations (pictorial group), and then took a learning test. Participants also took a battery of 14 cognitive measures related to the verbalizer-visualizer dimension including tests of cognitive style, learning...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Memory & cognition
دوره 33 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005